Filming females aboard subs? Gee, who didn't see this one coming?
Here is the link:http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/12/04/top-navy-brass-mum-about-suspected-filming-of-naked-women-on-submarines/
Maybe its a case of assuming too much but speaking as a retired sub sailor I can say this was to be expected. Especially given the close quarters aboard a boat.
You can also bet this is just the tip of the iceberg and a small taste of things to come.
Lord, I am SO GLAD to be retired from the sub force right now!
2 comments:
SUBVET, we are both DO GLAD to be out at this point in time of unnecessary insertion of females.
Women don't belong in crews of subs charged with missions vital to national defense. Women;s medical exigencies are 30% greater than males. Their quest for equality is misplaced in some environmets.
Although I foresee the Navy invoking more surface warfare type rigidity on submarines to accomodate women crew members, we both know that submarines require a more relaxed and informal atmosphere than skimmers in order to maintain peak performance.
Consequently, the world's preeminent submarine force may suffer declining male morale, recruiting and retention woes for insane PC reasons. This administration seems stuck on stupid!
Ditto to Vigilis. I was an RO on a 688 class back in the late 70s and early 80s. Women are equal to men in dignity, but thankfully different in function. This does NOT mean that women are less than or greater than men. It means they are - God bless them - different. What about that concept can the Obama Administration NOT understand as it send women aboard nuclear submarines and into armed combat, in both of which situations no woman belongs. This has had predictable results which are denigrating of women and men alike. May God save us from our foolishness.
BTW, can women fight? You betcha! Deborah and Judith in the Bible both come to mind. But those are exceptions to the rule where men should protect and defend family and homeland.
Post a Comment