Two prayers....

God's will be done and may He have mercy upon us all.

About Me

My photo
A Catholic who follows Rome & the Magisterium. I'm against gay "marriage", abortion, embryonic stem cell research, euthanasia, human cloning. Altar girls, Communion in the hand, Eucharistic Ministers and "Protestant" music in the Church doesn't bother me at all. A proud American retired submarine sailor. Our borders should be secured with a 10 ft. high fence topped by concertina wire with minefields out to 20 yards on both sides and an additional 10 yards filled with warning signs outside of that Let's get energy independent NOW! Back Israel to the max, stop appeasing followers of the Pedophile Prophet. Pro 2nd Amendment, pro death penalty, Repeal all hate crime legislation. Back the police unless you'd rather call a hippie when everything hits the fan. Get government out of dealing with education, childhood obesity and the enviornment. Stop using the military for sociological experiments and if we're in a war don't micromanage their every move. Kill your television, limit time on the computer and pick up a book. God's will be done and may He have mercy upon us all.

Monday, November 28, 2011

Cain and a 13 year affair...

As I predicted, the allegations against Herman Cain have increased in their severity. First it was "sexual harassment" in the workplace. When that didn't fly a bimbo conveniently came forward to allege an attempt at date rape, that flew like a lead balloon also. Now another SBGS (sperm belching gutter slut) comes into the spotlight to accuse him of having an affair with her of 13 years duration. Five gets you ten that'll also turn out to be extremely questionable.

Whoever wants him out is so blatant in upping the ante as time goes by that it isn't even funny. This stinks to high heaven. The steady progression in the level of immorality implied is so apparent that it's counterproductive. Why is this happening to Cain, why is he so obviously the focus? Is he seen as a threat to B.O. due to the fact of their shared skin color? Nobody can effectively play the race card when both contenders are as black as the ace of spades.

I support Cain, mostly for the fact that he IS NOT a politician. His gaffes and admitted ignorance are refreshingly human. His views on the OWS bums, abortion, muslims, etc. are straight from the shoulder, unvarnished, blunt and unequivocal. I have no grasp of economics, so all I can say about the "9-9-9" plan is that it sounds good.

All of what I just listed would be seen as liabilities in times past. As an example; remember how Steve Forbes and his ideas for tax reform were jeered into silence? From what I see there isn't much difference between him and Cain there. In past elections the attitude towards outsiders like Cain seemed to be "ignore him and he goes away". Why isn't Cain being ignored? If he can turn these allegations back on his accusers it'd really give him a boost. Why is that possibility seemingly ignored?

Somebody is uneasy about him. It'd be interesting to know who and why. The obvious playing on the old stereotype of the sex crazed black man is a risky ploy. Whoever is calling the shots on this smear campaign better be careful, it could all blow up in their collective face.

So what comes next? Accusations of a menage a trois with Flora & Fauna Amor of the Addams Family?

Thursday, November 24, 2011

Monday, November 21, 2011

My knee.

Barring any unforeseen glitches, I'll have my right knee replaced in March. Since losing some weight would facilitate the recovery process, I'll be cutting back on the food intake and staying physically active. Blogging will be light from this point onward. Any advice will be greatly appreciated.

Growing old; it ain't for sissies!

Saturday, November 19, 2011

No, they DO NOT belong in combat.

Agreement elusive on women in combat

Women don't belong in combat. They don't belong in the police departments/fire departments. They don't belong in any physically strenuous or dangerous occupation.

They are the civilizing agents of our culture, our better halves. As such they should set the tone of our national mindset. That means helping to run the country from back home while men do the physical tasks for which we are better suited.

Why yes, I am a Neanderthal. Did you have to ask?

Why yes, I do have one...

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/11/pelosi_accuses_catholics_of_having_this_conscience_thing.html?utm_source=dlvr.it

And damned proud of it!

Toys R' Us selling profanity spewing doll...

Heres the article: http://www.clickorlando.com/news/Parents-Cursing-baby-doll-should-not-be-sold/-/1637132/4783422/-/hw1vgb/-/index.html

Yep, no doubt about whats being said. My hearing positively stinks and I can make out the words with no problem.

This is disgusting.

Friday, November 18, 2011

Penance...

I normally abstain from red meat on Fridays, following the Catholic tradition of penitential recognition of the Crucifixion. Tonight though I'm attending a meeting of my CRHP men's group and one of the participants is bringing bratwurst. Not wanting to attract undue attention, I've already signed up for some.

So the question was, what to do as a substitution?

Unfortunately I just figured it out. It'll suck on toast, I hate the thought of it and it will REALLY be a penitential act.

The worst part is that I can't be more specific or it'd just be putting myself on display.

So why this post? Just as an aid to keeping my big mouth shut about the specifics of it and not telling anyone directly involved who will undoubtedly be pleased with an unlooked for action on my part. If I were closer to perfection this post wouldn't exist.

But Lord, life is really going to suck for a short time!

The only "Occupy" movement I agree with...

(H/T to Moonbattery)

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Another reason to unplug the tube...

Here it is...http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/pamela-anderson-virgin-mary-christmas-show-261145

I'll just leave that where it's at. Really. Some things are too repulsive to discuss.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

OWS explained.

Success, n. The one unpardonable sin against one's fellows.
Ambrose Bierce

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Illinois bishops announce shutdown of adoption services

Springfield, Ill., Nov 15, 2011 / 06:00 am (CNA/EWTN News).By Marianne Medlin- Bishops in three Illinois dioceses announced Nov. 14 that they have dropped their lawsuit against the state and will shut down their adoption and foster care programs, after a civil union law required them to provide their services to same-sex couples.

“The decision not to pursue further appeals was reached with great reluctance, but was necessitated by the fact that the State of Illinois has made it financially impossible for our agencies to continue to provide these services,” said Bishop Thomas J. Paprocki of Springfield, Bishop Edward K. Braxton of Belleville, and Bishop R. Daniel Conlon of Joliet.

“Since we now need to close offices and lay off employees, further appeals would be moot,” the bishops said.

Catholic Charities branches from the dioceses of Belleville, Springfield, Peoria, and Joliet had filed a lawsuit in June against the Illinois Attorney General's Office and the state’s Department of Children and Family Services to prevent them from ending state contracts for foster care and adoption programs with the charities.

The department told the agencies that it was ending their contracts over their alleged refusal to obey the 2011 Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Unions Act, which established legal privileges for same-sex and opposite-sex couples in civil unions.

Peter Breen, an attorney with the Thomas More Society, which represented the charities in their lawsuit against the state, called the news “tragic.”

In a Nov. 14 statement, Breen said the situation “stands as a stark lesson to the rest of the nation that legislators promising 'religious protection' in same sex marriage and civil union laws may not be able to deliver on those promises.”

In their remarks, the bishops noted how the Church has “successfully partnered with the State for half a century” and lamented the fact that the “the losers will be the children, foster care families and adoptive parents who will no longer have the option of Catholic, faith-based services.”

“We are sad to lose the dedicated employees who have served our Catholic foster care and adoption services so faithfully for so many years,” the bishops added. “We are grateful to them and reluctantly bid them farewell with our prayers and best wishes.”

Bishop Paprocki clarified that despite the loss of foster care and adoption services in his diocese, “our Catholic Charities in the Diocese Springfield in Illinois will continue to address the basic human needs of the poor in central Illinois in other ways.”

“The silver lining of this decision is that our Catholic Charities going forward will be able to focus on being more Catholic and more charitable,” he said, “while less dependent on government funding and less encumbered by intrusive state policies.”

The news of the decision to close the programs follows the Nov. 11 announcement by the Catholic Social Services of Southern Illinois that will it separate from the Belleville diocese and offer adoptions and foster-care services to same-sex couples.

The Catholic Social Services agency, which had been operating at the Belleville diocese since 1947, said that it will now be called Christian Social Services of Illinois.

Gary Huelsmann, the agency’s executive director, called the move a “solution” that will be “best for the children” as it ensures “their continuity of care.”

The Diocese of Belleville said in a Nov. 11 statement that the agency was unable “to remain faithful to the moral teaching of the Catholic Church” while adhering to the state's civil union law enacted in June.

Catholic Charities in the Diocese of Peoria announced in October that it will withdraw from all state contracts and transfer its staff to a new non-profit organization with no affiliation to the Catholic Church.

The new organization, titled the Center for Youth and Family Solutions, will take on the caseload of foster children from Peoria Catholic Charities starting Feb. 1.

Robert Gilligan, executive director of the Illinois Catholic Conference, summarized what he believes to be the underlying problem in remarks to CNA on Nov. 11.

What “you're seeing at the state level in Illinois, what you're seeing at the national level in Washington, D.C., is a consistent promulgation of policies and laws that are making it very difficult for faith-based agencies that believe that marriage is between one man and one woman,” Gilligan said.

(End of story, my comments follow)

This will happen with increasing frequency. We can look forward to little if any sympathy from the public at large as adherence to Church teaching will be considered secondary to "doing it for the children" and other feel good platitudes.

Well pardon me all over the place but "doing it for the children" takes a backseat to following the will of God. End of story.

That's where the disconnect comes with faithful Catholics and the population at large. Because although our nation is considered by many to be devoutly religious, that commitment only goes so far as convenience. Call any denomination what you will, be it Lutheran, Baptist, Evangelical, Independent, etc. when the rubber hits the road they all too often fit under "First National Church of I'm Okay and You're Okay". That applies to non Christian religious bodies also, there are some that are firmly committed to following God's will and then there are the rest.

But I'm Catholic so I'll only address the topic as far as it impacts my Church.

It will become more difficult to follow Church teaching without being castigated for bigotry, hate, etc.. We'll be asked why we can't be "reasonable" and "evolve" in our thinking. For a good example of where we'll wind up, consider how the Church's stance on artificial contraception is perceived. Soon it will extend to many other areas.

Christ didn't promise us a rose garden in this life. The fact that we've had it so easy in this country the past few decades has lulled many into a feeling of false security. Welcome to the real world.

Ever wonder what happened to Joseph's coat of many colors?

Now we know:

Why selecting Romney is a bad idea...

Thomas Sowell explains it very well: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/11/15/will_republicans_blow_it_112066.html

IMO we'll have to suffer through at least another four years of B.O., picking the wrong GOP candidate could feed into that.

Saturday, November 12, 2011

We're all Joe Paterno...

This is a post that'll drive off some followers.

Now the hue and cry over the sexual molestations involving a Penn State football coach are reaching a crescendo. Since the first story broke, right up to the present moment theres been a cry for Paterno's head. The recurring theme is, "He shoulda done more than just notify a university official..."

Noted. Now shut up why don't cha?

Paterno has been exonerated for any culpability under the law. So the legal angle is covered. As for anything beyond that, take a look around and tell me that we all don't do the minimum to cover our butts.

Do you have any young daughters, nieces, granddaughters? Do you think they should mature into sexually obsessed women? Then what do you do to counter the filth they're exposed to? What immediately comes to mind are the "women's magazines" near most food store checkouts. Why should an elementary school girl be exposed to an article titled, "How To Make Him Scream For More" or "Seven Ways Guaranteed To Bring Him To Orgasm"?

How the hell do young girls learn to be skanks? Did they all get born that way? Or over the years did they learn that being sexually active was okay, no matter what lip service "Mom and Dad" gave to the contrary? When we walk our kids through a sewer all day is it any wonder they become accustomed to the stench?

So what have you done to combat it? Have you spoken to the store management about putting covers over the mags? Have you written to the magazines editors? The same thing applies to clothing for young girls. What have you done besides just make them dress a bit different than their peers? Ever heard of the high school girl who keeps a change of clothing in her locker so she'll be able to wear what she wants after getting to school? Do you think it's only "white trash" that experience that?

How about video games? I'm not talking "PacMan", I'm thinking of the likes of "Grand Theft Auto". You know, the ones that glorify unlawful and/or violent behavior. Should our male children/grandchildren/etc. be routinely playing games where the one with the highest body count wins? Doesn't that benumb them some extent to extreme violence?

Back to magazines. How about the flip side, how about "mens magazines" that carry covers just this side of gay porn? Check out the cover of a typical issue of "Mens Health". Then tell me the six pack abs routinely depicted there don't qualify as homosexual erotica. Yeah, gay men aren't the target audience, just as hetero horn dogs aren't those who purchase "Cosmopolitan" with it's scantily clad cover girl. But who gets turned on by what?

Even for straight kids the message is pretty plain, i.e. life is all about being buff and toned. What are the odds a kid will want to be Sally Ride or Steve Jobs when with a little bit of work they could be Ron Jeremy or Linda Lovelace? Doesn't a positive exposure to possible role models have an effect on a child?

Of the four names just mentioned, which ones are our children more likely to recognize?

And what are you doing about it? Just not allowing porn into your home? Telling the children in your life theres more to it than just sex appeal and trying to get your rocks off as often as possible? Well that would be the equivalent of Paterno going to a university official about Sandusky. You're doing the legal minimum. Whoop-dee-due-dah-day.

We're all guilty. Guilty by our silence if nothing else. We all turn a blind eye and walk away instead of getting more involved in cleaning out the toilet of our culture. We do the minimum and call it good.

So why expect anything from an 84 year old football coach, no matter who he is?

The answer is, we SHOULD expect more. But that expectation shouldn't stop with the famous. It should extend to each and every one of us.

You think the television is nothing more than a purveyor of immorality? Don't just turn it off, start firing up the computer and let whoever heads the various studios know just what you think.

You're against abortion so you selectively buy only from those companies NOT supporting Planned Parenthood and it's ilk. Nice start, but keep on going. Let the companies you DON'T buy from know why you take your business elsewhere.

The list can go on and on. You got the idea about ten minutes ago.

Get involved as much as Paterno should have. Exert yourself as much as we call for him to have exerted himself. Get outside the comfort zone. Be a pain in the ass about morality no matter where you go. Because being silent in the face of evil is what Paterno did, it's what we're all doing. Don't just speak to a sympathetic audience, speak out at work, at family gatherings, at social events of all sorts. Be like an Old Testament prophet, call evil by it's name often and loud. Just remember that most Old Testament prophets DID NOT die of old age, in the rapidly putrefying world we live in that thought is worth keeping in mind.

We're all doing the minimum while our nation and culture slide into the cesspool. You do it, I do it. We all suck.

Our nation and culture reek to Heaven, we try staying uninvolved and call it good. Whatever happened to "...be in the world, not of it..."? Doesn't following that entail some involvement to make things better?

When you get right down to it, we're all Joe Paterno.

Friday, November 11, 2011

My Veteran's Day post...

Here's a fair-to-middling article about sub service. I'll never think of it as heroic, we just had a job to do. Quite often that job sucked on toast, mostly due to the long term discomfort and isolation from the rest of the world. The majority of us were never shot at, quite often a deployment was like a long bus ride with all the windows painted over. But other than that, the article is fairly accurate:

http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/10/us/veterans-in-focus-silent-service/index.html

It didn't involve a lot of physical danger. But it was a bit different. I'll close by quoting a SEAL Team member who rode on our last boat (we were set up for covert ops). After going through the same routine training as our helmsmen/planesmen this elite warrior of almost 20 years experience got out of the helmsman's chair, looked at the Control Room party and calmly stated, "You motherfuckers are all crazy". Then he went below to the Chief Petty Officer's Quarters (Goat Locker) for a cigarette and cup of coffee.

Wednesday, November 09, 2011

Facts about the Wall...

Took this from Knuckledraggin My Life Away:

SOMETHING to think about - Most of the surviving Parents are now deceased. There are 58,267 names now listed on that polished black wall, including those added in 2010. The names are arranged in the order in which they were taken from us by date and within each date the names are alphabetized. It is hard to believe it is 36 years since the last casualties.

Beginning at the apex on panel 1E and going out to the end of the East wall, appearing to recede into the earth (numbered 70E - May 25, 1968), then resuming at the end of the West wall, as the wall emerges from the earth (numbered 70W - continuing May 25, 1968) and ending with a date in 1975. Thus the war's beginning and end meet. The war is complete, coming full circle, yet broken by the earth that bounds the angle's open side and contained within the earth itself.

The first known casualty was Richard B. Fitzgibbon, of North Weymouth , Mass. Listed by the U.S. Department of Defense as having been killed on June 8, 1956. His name is listed on the Wall with that of his son, Marine Corps Lance Cpl. Richard B. Fitzgibbon III, who was killed on Sept. 7, 1965.

There are three sets of fathers and sons on the Wall.

39,996 on the Wall were just 22 or younger.

8,283 were just 19 years old.

The largest age group, 33,103 were 18 years old.

12 soldiers on the Wall were 17 years old.

5 soldiers on the Wall were 16 years old.

One soldier, PFC Dan Bullock was 15 years old.

997 soldiers were killed on their first day in Vietnam .

1,448 soldiers were killed on their last day in Vietnam .

31 sets of brothers are on the Wall.

Thirty one sets of parents lost two of their sons.

54 soldiers on attended Thomas Edison High School in Philadelphia . ( I wonder why so many from one school.)

8 Women are on the Wall. Nursing the wounded.

244 soldiers were awarded the Medal of Honor during the Vietnam War; 153 of them are on the Wall.

Beallsville, Ohio with a population of 475 lost 6 of her sons.

West Virginia had the highest casualty rate per capita in the nation. There are 711 West Virginians on the Wall.

The Marines of Morenci - They led some of the scrappiest high school football and basketball teams that the little Arizona copper town of Morenci (pop. 5,058) had ever known and cheered. They enjoyed roaring beer busts. In quieter moments, they rode horses along the Coronado Trail, stalked deer in the Apache National Forest . And in the patriotic camaraderie typical of Morenci's mining families, the nine graduates of Morenci High enlisted as a group in the Marine Corps. Their service began on Independence Day, 1966. Only 3 returned home.

The Buddies of Midvale - LeRoy Tafoya, Jimmy Martinez, Tom Gonzales were all boyhood friends and lived on three consecutive streets in Midvale, Utah on Fifth, Sixth and Seventh avenues. They lived only a few yards apart. They played ball at the adjacent sandlot ball field. And they all went to Vietnam . In a span of 16 dark days in late 1967, all three would be killed. LeRoy was killed on Wednesday, Nov. 22, the fourth anniversary of John F. Kennedy assassination. Jimmy died less than 24 hours later on Thanksgiving Day. Tom was shot dead assaulting the enemy on Dec. 7, Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day.

The most casualty deaths for a single day was on January 31, 1968 ~ 245 deaths. ( the Tet Offensive )

The most casualty deaths for a single month was May 1968 - 2,415 casualties were incurred.

For most Americans who read this they will only see the numbers that the Vietnam War created. To those of us who survived the war, and to the families of those who did not, we see the faces, we feel the pain that these numbers created. We are, until we too pass away, haunted with these numbers, because they were our friends, fathers, husbands, wives, sons and daughters. There are no noble wars, just noble warriors.

CAIN UNMASKED!!!

As per the MSM and various gold digging bimbos:

It's all over for Herman Cain now...

Who could refute allegations like this?


Tuesday, November 08, 2011

The Grinch of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue...

Found this at blog.heritage.blog :

Obama Couldn’t Wait: His New Christmas Tree Tax
David S. Addington


President Obama’s Agriculture Department today announced that it will impose a new 15-cent charge on all fresh Christmas trees—the Christmas Tree Tax—to support a new Federal program to improve the image and marketing of Christmas trees.

In the Federal Register of November 8, 2011, Acting Administrator of Agricultural Marketing David R. Shipman announced that the Secretary of Agriculture will appoint a Christmas Tree Promotion Board. The purpose of the Board is to run a “program of promotion, research, evaluation, and information designed to strengthen the Christmas tree industry’s position in the marketplace; maintain and expend existing markets for Christmas trees; and to carry out programs, plans, and projects designed to provide maximum benefits to the Christmas tree industry” (7 CFR 1214.46(n)). And the program of “information” is to include efforts to “enhance the image of Christmas trees and the Christmas tree industry in the United States” (7 CFR 1214.10).

To pay for the new Federal Christmas tree image improvement and marketing program, the Department of Agriculture imposed a 15-cent fee on all sales of fresh Christmas trees by sellers of more than 500 trees per year (7 CFR 1214.52). And, of course, the Christmas tree sellers are free to pass along the 15-cent Federal fee to consumers who buy their Christmas trees.

Acting Administrator Shipman had the temerity to say the 15-cent mandatory Christmas tree fee “is not a tax nor does it yield revenue for the Federal government” (76 CFR 69102). The Federal government mandates that the Christmas tree sellers pay the 15-cents per tree, whether they want to or not. The Federal government directs that the revenue generated by the 15-cent fee goes to the Board appointed by the Secretary of Agriculture to carry out the Christmas tree program established by the Secretary of Agriculture. Mr. President, that’s a new 15-cent tax to pay for a Federal program to improve the image and marketing of Christmas trees.

Nobody is saying President Obama doesn’t have authority to impose his new Christmas Tree Tax — his Administration cites the Commodity Promotion, Research and Information Act of 1996. Just because the Obama Administration has the legal power to impose its Christmas Tree Tax doesn’t mean it should do so.

The economy is barely growing and nine percent of the American people have no jobs. Is a new tax on Christmas trees the best President Obama can do?

And, by the way, the American Christmas tree has a great image that doesn’t need any help from the government.

(End of story, my comments follow.)

HUMBUG, YOU ASSHOLE!!! Lord but I'm glad we have an artificial tree.

Discount for abortions with a copy of the ad...

At first I thought it had to be from an internet version of The Inquirer. No such luck:
http://www.lifenews.com/2011/11/07/abortion-clinic-advertises-discount-for-sunday-abortions/

Just how long will it be before they offer a discount for presenting a copy of an ad when driving "Grannie" to her appointment for euthanasia?

Will they start giving Green Stamps for aborting a special needs kid?

Unfortunately, the possibilities are endless.

The First Thanksgiving...

Our oldest son has proudly taken to telling us all he's learned about the first Thanksgiving.

You know, when the Indians sat down with the Penguins and shared a meal.

Sometimes I think his world is a very strange and wonderful place.

Thats my boy!

Monday, November 07, 2011

"Fast and Furious" continues...

This was passed on to me from Adrienne, for which I dearly thank her:
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/11/07/holder-to-call-for-tighter-gun-control-in-fast-furious-testimony-tomorrow/

So here we are exactly where I've figured we'd be, i.e. the amoral swine in Foggy Bottom are going to use "Fast and Furious" to push for greater gun grabbing.

The question may be asked, "But they've been busted on this. Why would they press on with it?" The answer for this is the same as for the question, "Why do dogs lick their genitals?"

BECAUSE THEY CAN!!!

While those of us in the blogosphere and some other non somnolent individuals are aware of this, you can bet that the vast majority of drones sitting in front of their flatscreen TV's are unaware or just DO NOT CARE.

So Holder & Co. will push for a greater expansion of gun regulations, always put in the light of being "reasonable" and "responsible". Those opposing him and his kind will be painted as rabid gun clingers, intellectually incapable of accepting the higher level of reasoning that sees how this is not only necessary but desirable.

Stand by, it's gonna get more interesting and it won't stop after Jan. 20th of 2013 either.

About the latest assault on Herman Cain...

So now the latest accuser of Herman Cain has risen from the sewer. As you may be able to tell from that comment, I'm not convinced.

1) Even if it were true, this doesn't qualify as sexual harassment. The woman wasn't working for Cain, she was trying to get his backing in finding employment. I'd think it would only qualify as harassment if he could threaten her with dire consequences should she refuse his advances. At best he made unwanted sexual advances, which ceased as soon as she said "No".

2) Again, even if it were true, she's playing the naive waif too much. Let's see, she had her hotel accommodations unexpectedly upgraded, she's wined and dined by the man she's come to see. Then they take an evening ride to "check out the offices of the National Restaurant Association". Right. Sounds an awful like "I went up to his room to see his etchings". No clue whatsoever he might want something more? What planet has this bimbo been living on? Wherever it is, they suffer a deficiency of oxygen. Hell, I've known of guys who made advances after providing free donuts to the right bimbo (she accepted too!). This woman supposedly didn't think anything else was required?

FWIW, it only cost the sailor involved with the "pastry princess" a single donut. No, it wasn't yours truly either.

3) So she returns home and for well over a decade stays mum about the event, only coming forward when Cain runs for President. Right. Noted. BTW, why didn't she come forward when he ran for President in 2000 or for the Senate in 2004? Does his newly found prominence in the political arena now merit somebody's attention?

4) Okay, so much for "what if it's true". I don't believe it. No way, no how. As point #3 states, she could have come forward a lot sooner but didn't. Why?

5) This woman has an interesting background to say the least: http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/iteam&id=8422203 . I recommend clicking on the link and reading the story. Suffice to say, it does zippo to enhance her credibility ( TWO declarations of bankruptcy??)

6) Isn't it just too cutely coincidental that the first three claims against Cain were easily dismissed due to a lack of any details, so #4 comes on the scene with a detailed description of the entire evening? We now know that the woman wore a pleated skirt, Cain wore a suit with his shirt open, etc. The devil is in the details I guess.

I can't seem to fit this anywhere else, but am I the only one who feels there is just something worth noting in the fact that this woman is from Chicago?

7) I'm wondering whats next if this fails to gain sufficient traction? Will the next allegation have Herman Cain spending a wild weekend of debauchery, with enough sexual kinks, perversions and quirks to make an aircraft carrier's Singapore port call look like a guided tour of the Sistine Chapel?

8) One last observation. According to this poor lass, Herman Cain wanted to "get some" in the front seat of the car he drove. Look, the man is presently 65 years old. At the time of this incident he'd have been 53-54. I think most men who get to that age and are able to afford upgrading the hotel suite for the object of their affection will want to go use those same digs. He paid for 'em for crying out loud, and there'd be a hell of a lot more room in the bed than the car seat. Less likely to get busted by a cop or attract the attention of any nosy passerby too. Speaking strictly for myself, once I was able to afford a room after finding myself divorced (again) I got one and used it whenever I was "lucky". Only horny and broke teenagers try doing it in the car fer crying out loud!

Just my opinion.

Sunday, November 06, 2011

"If it ain't true it oughta be"....

So said Jebediah Nightlinger in "The Cowboys".

That quote came to mind while reading the following story (warning, very strong language in this post): This is it.

As I've said, if it ain't true it oughta be.

A comment on "Fast & Furious" and life in general.

Because I'm really averse to conspiracy theories, when "Fast & Furious" broke I had reservations about ascribing an intent of it to greater gun owner restrictions in our nation. I DID because it only made logical sense, didn't "feel" right but on an intellectual plane it seemed on target.

I still had reservations, feeling it had me wearing a tinfoil hat when I didn't want to.

But it seems theres more than one person who is on board with that same deduction, quite s few people as a matter of fact. They don't all sit at computer monitors in their jammies either. Here's the story:
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/11/05/its-happening-democratic-lawmakers-say-fast-and-furious-proof-of-need-for-harsher-gun-laws/

Yep, when the public starts fearing the government there is something definitely wrong. I think it went wrong a few decades back, we're now seeing the fruition of it all.

When we started seeing history rewritten in the schools and on the news is when everybody should have woken up.

When we allowed Uncle Sugar to institute the "Great Society" programs that have gutted the family structure of the poor and encouraged them to remain on the dole, we should have spoken up. In all fairness though, most of us were too damned young to do anything, I'd fault the adults of that time. That would be the so called "Greatest Generation" (no, I'm not their biggest fan).

When we saw the traditional values of our Judeo-Christian roots demonized and called into question, we should have shouted out with strong voices against it.

Now we're reaping the whirlwind. Not just in this instance but many others.

Saturday, November 05, 2011

A benefit of OWS...



With a hearty H/T to the Ignorant Redneck.

Wednesday, November 02, 2011

Blog Archive

THIS is depressing!!

THIS is depressing!!
Our education system must have REAL problems!

Proper Care of The Koran

Proper Care of The Koran
A place for everything and everything in it's place

Our Lady of America, pray for us (we need it!)

St. Gabriel Possenti, (unofficial) patron saint of handgun owners, pray for us.

Humane blogger award

Humane blogger award