Concerns over "homophobia" = censorship

Bet this wasn't on the MSM.

The article seems to be written by someone ready to faint from an attack of the "vapors". Nevertheless, once you get past the hyperventilating it's pretty disturbing. What's next? Will I have to remove my wedding ring before coming to work?

Here's the item that really got my attention;

Plaintiffs, Regina Rederford and Robin Christy posted the flier in response to an e-mail to city employees announcing formation of a gay and lesbian employee association and other communications. The two Christians responded with a promotion of their own -- the start of an informal group that respects "the natural family, marriage and family values."

But supervisors Robert Bobb (now in charge of the Washington DC school district) and Joyce Hicks, (deputy director of the Oakland Community and Economic Development Agency) ordered removal of the flier, stating it contained "statements of a homophobic nature" and promoted "sexual-orientation-based harassment," even though the flyer made absolutely no mention of homosexuality.

So if someone advocates traditional values in the makeup of an informal group it's seen as an attack on homosexuals? Yet it's okay to advertise for a homosexual employee association? Yep, some are more equal than others alright!

They're taking away our liberties one at a time.