AAP "compromises" on female circumcision.

I've never heard a damned thing that was positive about female circumcision. It's always been explained as a hazardous procedure found in Third World (mostly Muslim) countries. The rationale given was it takes away all joy of the woman for the conjugal act, thus discouraging promiscuity. "Barbaric" always struck me as a restrained description.

So why is the American Academy of Pediatricians signing on to this practice? Story here; http://www.aolnews.com/health/article/female-circumcision-compromise-allowing-ritual-nick-ignites-debate/19468638

And why aren't the feminazis up in arms over this?

It makes no sense, no damned sense whatsoever.