When will B.O. & Co. support the military?

Found this via Lucianne.com on commentarymagazine.com:

The Price of Those Seminars

Posted By Jennifer Rubin On October 31, 2009 @ 9:15 AM

This sobering report comes from the Washington Post:

More than 1,000 American troops have been wounded in battle over the past three months in Afghanistan, accounting for one-fourth of all those injured in combat since the U.S.-led invasion in 2001. The dramatic increase has filled military hospitals with more amputees and other seriously injured service members and comes as October marks the deadliest month for American troops in Afghanistan.

How many were killed or lost a limb, I wonder, while the president dithered and delayed implementing the recommendations of his hand-picked general? It is not an inconsequential question. The president acts as though there were no downside to the lethargic pace of his decision-making. He would have us believe that there is no price to be paid as he micromanages, province-by-province, the number of troops he’ll dispense. He seems content to entertain the recommendations of Gens. Joe Biden and John Kerry – drawing on their years of experience (in assessing nearly every national-security challenge incorrectly) while discarding that of the real experts.

What’s a few more weeks? Or months? Well, we know there is indeed a price to allowing our current approach to languish. There is a very real cost to delaying implementation of the new plan that is the best available to achieve victory as quickly as possible. The enemy is emboldened. More civilians die. The political and security situation in Pakistan worsens. And more brave Americans are asked to sacrifice themselves while Obama considers and reconsiders whether there isn’t any way to shave some money off the tab and reduce the number of troops his commanders say are needed. After all, health care is going to cost an awful lot.

The horrid reality of war is that parents send their children to die or to return in a condition they could not possibly have envisioned. But to sacrifice even a single American who was engaged in a fruitless exercise or an understaffed operation so the president can conduct a seminar and postpone a confrontation with his own party (which no longer can stomach the “good war”) is reprehensible.

Every damned one of the casualties is someones son, brother, husband, father or friend. They aren't all just names on a list. Lately I've started looking for more in depth information on the names I put up every week. It's sobering to say the least.

One man was leading efforts to provide water supplies in drought-stricken Africa before he went on active duty, yet another was a full-blooded Navajo active in tribal affairs, another hadn't seen his mother in seven years because of her antipathy towards his military service, many were fresh out of high school and looking to provide a meaningful contribution to their nation, it goes on and on...

They were all SOMEBODY, not just warm bodies wearing a uniform. The men and women serving deserve our support to the max, because they themselves may be giving their all sometime soon.

And the present Administration is contemptible in it's treatment of them.